Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Book of Evidence$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Peter Achinstein

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780195143898

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0195143892.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 10 August 2020

What's Wrong With These Probabilistic Theories of Evidence?

What's Wrong With These Probabilistic Theories of Evidence?

(p.69) 4 What's Wrong With These Probabilistic Theories of Evidence?
The Book of Evidence

Peter Achinstein (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

Counterexamples are presented against the two standard probabilistic theories of evidence of Ch. 3. Various responses of defenders of these probabilistic theories are considered. It is argued that evidence, by contrast to probability, is a threshold concept that requires a certain amount of probability before any evidence is present. Patrick Maher's defense of the positive relevance view of evidence is presented and rejected.

Keywords:   evidence, Maher, probabilistic theory of evidence, probability, threshold

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .