Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Fighting UnemploymentThe Limits of Free Market Orthodoxy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David Howell

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780195165845

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: July 2005

DOI: 10.1093/0195165845.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 04 August 2021

 Is the OECD Jobs Strategy behind U.S. and British Employment and Unemployment Success in the 1990s?

 Is the OECD Jobs Strategy behind U.S. and British Employment and Unemployment Success in the 1990s?

(p.156) 5. Is the OECD Jobs Strategy behind U.S. and British Employment and Unemployment Success in the 1990s?
Fighting Unemployment

John Schmitt

Jonathan Wadsworth

Oxford University Press

The authors investigate the extent to which the logic of flexibility that underpins the OECD’s Job Study can explain the relative labor-market performance of the United States and the United Kingdom. Greater labor-market flexibility should be associated with relatively lower unemployment and higher employment of less-skilled workers, particularly young workers and those with lower levels of formal education: lower labor costs should “price” these workers back into jobs. Their principal findings call into question this central orthodox thesis. Labor market outcomes of both young and less-skilled workers in the flexible United States and United Kingdom are no better and frequently are far worse than those of their counterparts in most of the rest of the OECD. Regarding the U.K., Schmitt and Wadsworth conclude that “the serious restructuring of the country’s labor market since the early 1980s appears to have produced no noticeable improvement in the labor market prospects facing less-skilled workers in the 1990s relative to the 1980s.” Indeed, they find that all of the improvement in U.K. unemployment rates is accounted for, not by workers being priced into the labor market, but by workers dropping out of the labor market.

Keywords:   flexibility, welfare state, labor market, regulation, deregulation, unemployment, employment, labor market institutions, unemployment benefits, wages, wage inequality (wage dispersion), less-educated (less-skilled) workers, youth, United Kingdom, United States

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .