Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Moral ThinkingIts Levels, Method, and Point$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

R. M. Hare

Print publication date: 1981

Print ISBN-13: 9780198246602

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198246609.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 25 October 2020

Fanaticism and Amoralism

Fanaticism and Amoralism

10 Fanaticism and Amoralism
Moral Thinking

R. M. Hare

Oxford University Press

There are fanatics and amoralists whose inability or refusal to face facts, or think clearly, or for other reasons present a problem for moral theory. The amoralist refrains from making moral judgements at all or makes only judgements of moral indifference. The fanatic makes moral judgements, but clings to them in a peculiarly obdurate way, which resists critical thinking. Hare goes on to formulate the amoralist position and shows why only one version of the position is tenable. Amoralism is an option left open by our system of moral reasoning. All that can be done to prevent agents from choosing to be amoralists is to provide reasons of a non‐moral sort.

Keywords:   amoralism, fanaticism, moral judgement, morality

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .