Contains remarks on the kind of philosopher Hume was; the subtle interplay in his work between logical analysis and naturalistic psychology. His distinction between ideas and impressions; his attempt to use it to differentiate experiencing from remembering, both from thinking or imagining and his account of memory are described. His ‘copy thesis’ says that every (1) simple idea is (2) copied from (3) an earlier impression; a defence is given here for reconstruing it as saying that every (1) word that cannot be verbally defined must be (2) explicable in terms of its bearing upon (3) experience of the objective world.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.