Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The National Co-ordination of EU PolicyThe Domestic Level$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Hussein Kassim, Guy Peters, and Vincent Wright

Print publication date: 2000

Print ISBN-13: 9780198296645

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198296649.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 28 October 2020



(p.79) 3 France
The National Co-ordination of EU Policy

Anand Menon (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

This chapter on the national co-ordination of European Union (EU) policy in France starts by pointing out that the French objectives are ambitious, and argues that a profound tension exists between the declared ambitions and the intrinsic difficulties faced in achieving effective co-ordination. Would-be co-ordinators need to confront several elements of fragmentation within the core executive itself, most notably: a bicephalous and sporadically politically divided executive; a strong sense of departmentalism, frequently associated with entrenched interests and manifested in interministerial squabbles; and ‘vertical’ divisions between the political and administrative levels, often characterized by tensions between senior officials and political appointees in ministerial cabinets. At one level, the system put into place in France has succeeded in resolving these problems and resulted in effective co-ordination, but at another, co-ordinators in Paris face significant problems as they strive to ensure the coherence of French policy positions in Brussels. The two main sections of the chapter look at routine policy matters of European Community (EC) legislation (for which a formal institutionalized system of co-ordination has been created both intraministerially and interministerially, and in which the role of parliament is weak), and non-routine co-ordination (comprising more set-piece decision-making involving political leaders, and including the preparation of and participation in European Councils, the organization of the French presidency of the Council of Ministers, and intergovernmental conferences). The conclusion outlines the two main hurdles to co-ordination that have limited the effectiveness of the system. The relative autonomy of certain powerful ministries, and the significant gap between the administrative and political levels.

Keywords:   constraints, domestic policy, EU policy, European Union, France, institutional structures, national co-ordination

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .