Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Value JudgementImproving Our Ethical Beliefs$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

James Griffin

Print publication date: 1998

Print ISBN-13: 9780198752318

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198752318.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 26 September 2020

Improving Our Ethical Beliefs

Improving Our Ethical Beliefs

(p.3) I Improving Our Ethical Beliefs
Value Judgement

James Griffin (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

How should we criticize and improve our ethical beliefs? This chapter assesses the methods most employed, or given lip‐service to, by philosophers today: piecemeal appeal to intuition and striving for wide reflective equilibrium. It argues that both have merit, but neither goes nearly far enough. The method of wide reflective equilibrium has plausibility in the natural sciences, but ethics lacks two of the features necessary for this plausibility: beliefs of high reliability (in the natural sciences, perceptual beliefs) and a certain kind of system.

Keywords:   coherentism, ethical intuitions, ethics, foundationalism, method, reflective equilibrium

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .