Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Environmental Justice and the New PluralismThe Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David Schlosberg

Print publication date: 2002

Print ISBN-13: 9780199256419

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0199256411.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 12 April 2021

Components of a Critical Pluralism: Ethics and Processes

Components of a Critical Pluralism: Ethics and Processes

(p.69) 4 Components of a Critical Pluralism: Ethics and Processes
Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism

David Schlosberg (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

The acceptance of multiplicity as the precondition of political action is central to the new generation of theorists and activists that the author designates as ‘critical pluralists’. In political and social theory, a range of authors has finally begun to respond to a lament broached by Mary Parker Follett in 1918: pluralists early in the century had acknowledged difference, she noted, but they had not arrived at the heart of the question – what is to be done with this diversity? This chapter examines some of the contemporary responses to Follett’s question and constructs a list of practices necessary to build political relations across difference. These get at issues of justice beyond the material, concerning both recognition and participatory process, and it is argued that agonistic respect (William Connolly 1991), attempts at intersubjective understanding (Seyla Benhabib 1992; Jurgen Habermas 1970; Axel Honneth 1992), inclusive, open discourse free from domination and the possibility of reprisals (John Dryzek 1990; John Forester 1989; Habermas 1984, 1987), and the development of a particular form of solidarity are all crucial to the practices suggested by a new generation of pluralist theory. Solidarity (unity without uniformity) is complex in that it centres on the process of reconciling difference with the need for concerted political action. The author focuses on how the notion of unity suggested by Follett was discarded by the second generation of pluralism, but is now mirrored by numerous contemporary theorists, including Richard Rorty (1989), Donna Haraway (1991), and Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari (1987).

Keywords:   agonistic respect, Axel Honneth, critical pluralism, difference, diversity, Donna Haraway, ethics, Felix Guattari, Gilles Deleuze, inclusive discourse, intersubjectivity, John Dryzek, John Forester, Jurgen Habermas, justice, Mary Parker Follett, multiplicity, open discourse, participation, political action, political relations, processes, recognition, Richard Rorty, Seyla Benhabib, solidarity, theory, unity, WilliamConnolly

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .