Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Knowledge and Practical Interests$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jason Stanley

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780199288038

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2006

DOI: 10.1093/0199288038.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use.date: 07 July 2022

Interest‐Relative Invariantism versus Relativism

Interest‐Relative Invariantism versus Relativism

Chapter:
(p.131) 7
Source:
Knowledge and Practical Interests
Author(s):

Jason Stanley (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199288038.003.0008

Relativism about knowledge-attributions is the thesis that knowledge attributions express propositions the truth of which is relative to a judge. On this view, a knowledge attribution may express a proposition that is true for one judge, and false for another. This chapter explains and criticizes various versions of relativism about knowledge attributions.

Keywords:   relativism, David Kaplan, Peter Lasersohn, Mark Richard, John MacFarlane, factivity, standards operator, Interest-Relative Invariantism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .