This chapter reiterates the main idea developed in this book: in some languages, the ergative argument is a prepositional phrase, base-generated in the specifier of the transitive v. The prepositional nature of that ergative expression accounts for a range of properties that would be unexpected if it were a DP: it cannot undergo A-movement, such as raising; it is an island for subextraction; its ability to determine verbal agreement is limited and is parasitic on agreement with a DP; it cannot bind other elements in the clause the way a DP would be able to bind them. Crucially, all these characteristics are correlated with and follow from the PP nature of the ergative. Understood within this context, syntactic ergativity becomes just one symptom of a language design according to which transitive verbs have PP-subjects, not DPs in the subject position.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.