Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Managed SpeechThe Roberts Court's First Amendment$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Gregory P. Magarian

Print publication date: 2017

Print ISBN-13: 9780190466794

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2017

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190466794.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 31 October 2020

Keeping Money out of Elections

Keeping Money out of Elections

Government Leveling and Labor Speech

Chapter:
(p.193) Chapter 8 Keeping Money out of Elections
Source:
Managed Speech
Author(s):

Gregory P. Magarian

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190466794.003.0008

This chapter covers another group of Roberts Court campaign finance decisions that, contrary to this Court’s signature decision in Citizens United, restrict the flow of money into politics. These decisions strike down government efforts to increase the resources available for underfinanced candidates, and they stifle public employee unions’ efforts to collect and spend agency fees from non-members. In only one, very narrow decision does the Court actually uphold a government restriction on electoral money. Concluding the book’s discussion of speech disputes in the electoral process, this chapter explains that the Roberts Court lets wealthy, powerful institutions and individuals, who share a strong interest in maintaining existing political distributions of wealth and power, dominate electoral debates. The Court lets those powerful speakers crowd out lesser-funded speakers with a stronger inclination to challenge existing distributions.

Keywords:   U.S. Supreme Court, Roberts Court, First Amendment, free speech, electoral process, public election financing, public employee unions, political equality, judicial elections

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .