Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Philosophy As FictionSelf, Deception, and Knowledge in Proust$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Joshua Landy

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780195169393

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169393.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 24 November 2020

Philosophy and Fiction (Nobody's Madeleine)

Philosophy and Fiction (Nobody's Madeleine)

Chapter:
(p.3) Introduction Philosophy and Fiction (Nobody's Madeleine)
Source:
Philosophy As Fiction
Author(s):

Joshua Landy (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169393.003.0001

The introductory chapter examines Proust's philosophy, arguing that it is both coherent and original. Particular attention is paid to Proust's moraliste-inspired philosophy of mind: many of the fundamental aspects of the novel, from its theories of knowledge and memory to the narrator's system of “laws” — several of which apply only to himself or, at best, to those like him, and others of which reveal themselves to be mere provisional hypotheses — testify, it turns out, to the complex interactions of intuition and intellect. This chapter also issues a warning: Proust's philosophy cannot be derived directly from the claims put forward in his novel. Readers must keep the first-person narrator (“Marcel”) separate from Proust if they are to read the Recherche correctly. Careful examination of the novel shows, and documentary evidence corroborates, that Proust periodically makes Marcel adopt (and sometimes abandon) certain beliefs he himself considers to be erroneous. Marcel's views, then, are not always identical to Proust's views. Moreover, Marcel's novel — the one he begins writing at the end of the story — is not identical to Proust's novel. For in spite of what almost all readers have assumed, Marcel does not end up writing In Search of Lost Time. Just as Proust's philosophy diverges (in part) from Marcel's philosophy, so too does Proust's literary project diverge (in part) from Marcel's literary project. It follows that only a careful reading can allow us to reconstruct the belief system of Proust himself, and his project in writing the Recherche. Proust, it turns out, wishes to offer himself as an exemplar of creativity, his character as a model of philosophical self-fashioning, and his massive novel as a training-ground for lucid self-delusion.

Keywords:   philosophy of mind, unreliable narrator, authorship, irony, faculties, intellect, intuition, imagination, maxims

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .