Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Value-Free Science?Ideals and Illusions$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Harold Kincaid, John Dupré, and Alison Wylie

Print publication date: 2007

Print ISBN-13: 9780195308969

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308969.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 02 March 2021

 Constructive Empiricism and the Role of Social Values in Science

 Constructive Empiricism and the Role of Social Values in Science

(p.164) 8 Constructive Empiricism and the Role of Social Values in Science
Value-Free Science?

Sherrilyn Roush (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

In her book Science as Social Knowledge, Helen Longino argued not only that social values are in fact ineliminable from theory choice in science but also that we ought to rewrite our ideals in such a way as to incorporate this fact. One of the most common criticisms of this idea of granting a legitimate role for social values in theory choice in science is that it just doesn't make sense to regard social preferences as relevant to the truth or to the way things are. According to Susan Haack, what is at issue is whether it is possible to derive an “is” from an “ought.” One can see that this is not possible, she concludes. Haack does not provide an argument for the view that it is impossible to derive an is from an ought, but the intuition she expresses is strong and widespread. This chapter shows that even if we grant this view, we may still consistently believe that social values have a legitimate role in theory choice in science. The chapter defends this conclusion by outlining a view about social values and theory choice that is based on the constructive empiricism (CE) of Bas van Fraassen. It is argued that some questions about what role social values may legitimately play in science look different depending on whether they are viewed from a realist perspective, according to which the aim of science is literally true description of reality, or from the point of view of a constructive empiricist antirealism, according to which the aim of science is empirical adequacy, the fit of a theory to the observables.

Keywords:   Helen Longino, Susan Haack, Bas van Fraassen, constructive empiricism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .