Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Finding and Evaluating EvidenceSystematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Practice$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Denise E. Bronson and Tamara S. Davis

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780195337365

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195337365.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 15 April 2021

Assessing the Quality of Systematic Reviews

Assessing the Quality of Systematic Reviews

6 Assessing the Quality of Systematic Reviews
Finding and Evaluating Evidence

Denise E. Bronson

Tamara S. Davis

Oxford University Press

This chapter begins by examining the differences between systematic reviews and traditional literature reviews in order to help identify systematic reviews. Evaluative criteria for judging the quality of existing systematic reviews is presented and a checklist is provided to help measure the overall quality of a systematic review.

Keywords:   literature reviews, PRISMA, transparency, completeness, relevance

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .