Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Constitutional Limits on Coercive Interrogation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Amos N. Guiora

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780195340310

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340310.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 31 October 2020

Introducing the Hybrid Paradigm and the Historical Analogy

Introducing the Hybrid Paradigm and the Historical Analogy

Chapter:
(p.9) CHAPTER 2 Introducing the Hybrid Paradigm and the Historical Analogy
Source:
Constitutional Limits on Coercive Interrogation
Author(s):

Amos N. Guiora

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340310.003.0002

An individual accused of involvement in terrorism must be brought to some form of trial, but the American criminal law process is inapplicable to the current conflict. To guarantee the suspect certain rights and privileges, the hybrid paradigm would provide the following: 1) lawful coercive interrogation of a suspect ranted Miranda protections; 2) remand hearings before a court designed to prevent indefinite detention; 3) the right to counsel of the suspect's own choosing; 4) admissibility of the intelligence information into trial; 5) bench trials before specially trained judges; 6) conviction based in part (but not more than 50%) on intelligence information; 7) sentencing guidelines; and 8) and right to appeal to an independent judiciary. The hybrid paradigm also calls for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Court to become a domestic terror court premised on a Congressional amendment to Article III of the Constitution.

Keywords:   Miranda, indefinite detention, right to counsel, American deep south, military commissions, intelligence gathering, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .