Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
First Do No Self HarmUnderstanding and Promoting Physician Stress Resilience$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Charles Figley, Peter Huggard, and Charlotte Rees

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780195383263

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195383263.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 26 January 2021

Bringing Complexity thinking to Curriculum Development

Bringing Complexity thinking to Curriculum Development

Implications for Faculty and Medical Student Stress and Resilience

(p.88) 5 Bringing Complexity thinking to Curriculum Development
First Do No Self Harm

Cathy Risdon

Sue Baptiste

Oxford University Press

This chapter presents an account of a curricular "experiment" at McMaster University in Canada that set out to enhance "resilience" for medical students, some theoretical underpinnings drawn from complexity sciences, and some observations that are intended to broaden our concept of what we think we are talking about when we consider issues of stress and resilience in the work of physicians and how this impacts medical education. This account draws upon thinking from recent social and complexity sciences to illustrate what other authors in this book will be emphasizing: that issues of stress, resilience, and professionalization are multifactorial and multidimensional. The English language tends to put things at rest: “stress” and “resilience” are often pointed to as static concepts to be looked at, explored, and planned for. If we think of the matters at hand in terms of processes, not nouns or objects, the question becomes more about the quality of our participating. What if “stress” and “resilience” were “verbs” or actions, showing themselves in everyday acts of relating? Perhaps then, learning the arts and skills of resilience would need to focus more on everyday interactions. In this chapter, we report on our experience over several years of trying to plan a new curriculum which had, among other things, the mandate to promote student self-care. Themes of both stress and resilience emerged for all involved: planners, teachers, and students. We invite you to consider how these themes relate to your own educational setting.

Keywords:   stress, resilience, medical education, professionalization, complexity science, curricular processes, innovative curriculum, professional support

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .