Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Truth and PluralismCurrent Debates$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nikolaj J.L.L. Pedersen and Cory D. Wright

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780195387469

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387469.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 04 December 2021

A Plurality of Pluralisms

A Plurality of Pluralisms

Chapter:
(p.123) { 7 } A Plurality of Pluralisms
Source:
Truth and Pluralism
Author(s):

Crispin Wright

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387469.003.0007

This chapter distinguishes four modes of alethic pluralism—simple alethic, family—resemblance, network analysis, and conferral pluralism—discuss them vis-à-vis several fundamental concepts—CONCEPT, PREDICATE, and PROPERTY—and considers objections before developing a version of conferral pluralism. Many philosophers compare truth and winning. Different things amount to winning in different games, but it is not a family-resemblance concept—no network of overlapping features tie together what it is to win games. Following Douglas Edwards’s suggestion, it’s argued that certain conditionals are true of truth in different regions of discourse just as they are of games: winning and speaking truth consists in doing or saying different domain-specific things. These constitutive relationships are necessities: they surface in the (conceptual) necessity of the kind of conditionals illustrated. Conferral is entailment within the scope of a hypothesis, or within the scope of a master antecedent. The embedded conditional holds in all worlds where the master antecedent is true.

Keywords:   alethic pluralism, analogy, conferral, Douglas Edward, family resemblance, Michael Lynch, mixed inferences, mixed compounds, network analysis, Truth & Objectivity

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .