Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Simple Heuristics in a Social World$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ralph Hertwig, Ulrich Hoffrage, and ABC Research Group

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780195388435

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 30 November 2020

Why Simple Heuristics Make Life Both Easier and Harder: A Social–Psychological Perspective

Why Simple Heuristics Make Life Both Easier and Harder: A Social–Psychological Perspective

Chapter:
(p.487) 18 Why Simple Heuristics Make Life Both Easier and Harder: A Social–Psychological Perspective
Source:
Simple Heuristics in a Social World
Author(s):

Klaus Fiedler

Michaela Wänke

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0018

The purpose of the present chapter is to consider social rationality from the perspective of social psychology. According to the dual-process approaches that dominate contemporary social psychology, rationality is only possible in the systematic processing mode, whereas the heuristic processing mode is considered intrinsically flawed, in contrast to the unifying theme of the present volume. This chapter argues that social psychology's old-fashioned distinction of heuristic and systematic processing modes is hardly tenable. At the same time, the chapter shows that empirical and theoretical research in social psychology has distinct implications for all three major facets of rationality: probabilities, utilities, and integration rules. In social environments, the assessment of probabilities depends crucially on the active participation of social beings, who must not be conceived as passive observers but actively search for and often create information in a dynamic interaction with their social and physical environment. Utilities, the other major constituent of decision theories, are also subject to typical social trade-offs and compensation effects. One person's gains are usually other persons' losses; what is pleasant in the short run is often unpleasant in the long run. Last but not least, the integration of probabilities and utilities becomes a social issue because many cognitive functions of remembering, thinking, reasoning, judging, and deciding do not take place within isolated individuals' minds but in dyads, groups, and organizations.

Keywords:   correspondence, coherence, utility assessment, probabilistic assessment, information integration, regression trap, compensation, logic of conversation, collective decision making, normative standards

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .