This chapter presents mounting criticism of the unrepresentativeness of silks and judges. The selection process was particularly vulnerable: an anonymous barrister denounced favouritism and the misuse of privilege; the 1995 Bar annual general meeting expressed grave concern; and LS President Rodger Pannone declared that the practice owed nothing to the principles of defining quality. The ABC Working Party declared that some outward indication of an individual's achievement and career progression was an almost universal aspect of professional work. The role of silk had supreme importance as a means of identifing those practitioners of outstanding ability. The criticism that the concept of the silk increases the level of fees and therefore costs was not justifiable because it is a commercial truth that the members of the perceived front rank of any profession are always able to command higher status and wages.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.