Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jack Beatson and Daniel Friedman

Print publication date: 1997

Print ISBN-13: 9780198265788

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265788.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 02 December 2020

Relational Contracts

Relational Contracts

(p.291) 11 Relational Contracts
Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law

Melvin A Eisenberg

Oxford University Press

This chapter argues that the relational contract literature cannot offer a definition of relational contracts, to which special rules are to apply. It advances the theory that most contracts are in fact relational, and that the weakness of both classical law and modern relational theory derives from their shared implicit assumption that most contracts are discrete. Because most contracts are relational, a special body of law for relational contracts cannot be created. Instead, the general principles of contract law should be sufficiently expansive to deal appropriately with both relational and discrete contracts.

Keywords:   contract law, classical law, relational theory, discrete contracts

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .