Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Reality of International LawEssays in Honour of Ian Brownlie$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Guy S. Goodwin-Gill and Stefan Talmon

Print publication date: 1999

Print ISBN-13: 9780198268376

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268376.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 28 November 2020

Maritime Delimitation after Denmark v. Norway: Back to the Future?

Maritime Delimitation after Denmark v. Norway: Back to the Future?

(p.153) Chapter 7 Maritime Delimitation after Denmark v. Norway: Back to the Future?
The Reality of International Law

Malcolm D. Evans

Oxford University Press

This chapter examines the impact of the case Denmark v. Norway on maritime delimitation. It suggests that despite the new lease of life given to equidistance by the decision in this case, there are plenty of reasons to suggest that the Court may be continuing to move away from a concept of delimitation based upon coastal geographical characteristics and towards a concept of delimitation that takes greater account of the economic realities of the area. It discusses the court's basis for its decision in this case.

Keywords:   Denmark, Norway, maritime delimitation, equidistance, court decision, international law

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .