Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Civil Justice in CrisisComparative Perspectives of Civil Procedure$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Adrian Zuckerman

Print publication date: 1999

Print ISBN-13: 9780198298335

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298335.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 29 October 2020

Civil Justice Reform: Access, Cost, and Expedition. The German Perspective

Civil Justice Reform: Access, Cost, and Expedition. The German Perspective

Chapter:
(p.206) (p.207) 6 Civil Justice Reform: Access, Cost, and Expedition. The German Perspective
Source:
Civil Justice in Crisis
Author(s):

Peter Gottwald

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298335.003.0006

The German Code of Civil Procedure (Zivilprozeβordnung) of 1877 was inspired by the French Code de Procedure Civil of 1806. Following the French example, the German Code was geared towards the principles of orality and immediacy, and, at the same time, gave wide scope to liberal moral concepts. Party control over litigation extended not simply to procedural materials and the subject matter of the proceedings, but also to the course of the proceedings themselves. The judge was largely passive. Almost no precautions were taken to prevent the parties from drawing out cases over an unreasonably long period of time. However, towards the end of the 19th century, the view that proceedings are not purely the private business of the disputing parties, but a social duty of the state, began to be increasingly asserted in Germany. The relationship between the judge's power and party freedom was altered accordingly. This social conception of procedure has arisen alongside the pre-existing liberal conception of procedure, without completely relegating the liberal conception to a secondary role. As well as this change, civil proceedings now increasingly appear to be a mass phenomenon. The legislature repeatedly tries to accelerate the judicial process and to relieve the courts of superfluous work, so that the increasing number of pending proceedings can be dealt with within a reasonable time. This chapter discusses organization of civil jurisdiction in Germany, main problems in the administration of civil justice in Germany, historical perspective of reform, and alternative methods of dispute resolution.

Keywords:   civil procedure, procedural reform, civil litigation, Germany, civil justice

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .