Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion gives the history of the 'no property rule' relating to the human body and its parts, and the implications thereof. The inadequacies of the law in providing protection to entitlements to bodily material meant that exceptions have emerged. These exceptions incorporated both Lockean and Hegelian reasoning. The result is a property law that is unusually ambiguous. Finally, the conclusion sets out the aim of the book's recommendations: to attempt to resist the coupling of the exclusionary boundary with contingency rights in the law that applies to the use and storage of bodily material.
Keywords: bodily material, property law, Locke, Hegel, contingency rights, rights-holder
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .
