Constitutional Preferences and Parliamentary Reform: Explaining National Parliaments' Adaptation to European Integration
Thomas Winzen
Abstract
This book provides a comprehensive account of national parliaments’ adaptation to European integration. Advancing an explanation based on political parties’ constitutional preferences, it investigates the nature and variation of parliamentary rights in European Union affairs across countries and levels of governance. In some member states, parliaments have traditionally been strong and parties hold intergovernmental visions of European integration. In these countries, strong parliamentary rights emerge in the context of parties’ efforts to realize their preferred constitutional design for the ... More
This book provides a comprehensive account of national parliaments’ adaptation to European integration. Advancing an explanation based on political parties’ constitutional preferences, it investigates the nature and variation of parliamentary rights in European Union affairs across countries and levels of governance. In some member states, parliaments have traditionally been strong and parties hold intergovernmental visions of European integration. In these countries, strong parliamentary rights emerge in the context of parties’ efforts to realize their preferred constitutional design for the European polity. Parliamentary rights remain weakly developed where federally oriented parties prevail, and where parliaments have long been marginal arenas in domestic politics. Moreover, divergent constitutional preferences underlie inter-parliamentary disagreement on national parliaments’ collective rights at the European level. Constitutional preferences are key to understanding why a ‘Senate’ of national parliaments never enjoyed support and why the alternatives subsequently put into place have stayed clear of committing national parliaments to any common policies. This study calls into question existing explanations that focus on strategic partisan incentives arising from minority and coalition government. It, furthermore, rejects the exclusive attribution of parliamentary ‘deficits’ to the structural constraints created by European integration and, instead, restores a sense of accountability for parliamentary rights to political parties and their ideas for the European Union’s constitutional design.
Keywords:
European integration,
national parliaments,
political parties,
constitutional preferences,
parliamentary rights,
adaptation,
constitutional design,
collective rights
Bibliographic Information
Print publication date: 2017 |
Print ISBN-13: 9780198793397 |
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2017 |
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198793397.001.0001 |
Authors
Affiliations are at time of print publication.
Thomas Winzen, author
Senior Researcher, Center for Comparative and International Studies, ETH Zurich
More
Less