The aim of this book is to discuss the most abstract and general issues that the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) raises. The more important the ECHR becomes in European law and politics, the greater the need to reflect on the moral foundations of rights and to insist that courts apply consistently principles of interpretation that can be justified as a matter of abstract values of political morality. This introductory chapter outlines the three specific issues that form the subject matter of this book. First, the worry that the judges of the European Court of Human Rights will exercise illegitimate judicial discretion if they interpret the Convention in a creative way. Second, the controversy over the interpretive methods actually used by the Court. Finally, the extent to which the Court's interpretation of the Convention rights conforms or should conform to the moral foundations of human rights.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.