This concluding chapter presents the main thesis expounded in the book, i.e., that the increased interaction between national and international laws and institutions warrants the rethinking of traditional notions concerning the jurisdictional relations between national and international courts. Specifically, it argues that judges in national and international courts are faced with a number of policy choices relating to jurisdiction-regulation: e.g., how to conceptualize the jurisdictional relations between national and international courts, how to ascertain similarity in the proceedings, and whether to aspire for an integrative or disintegrative approach in dispute settlements. Unlike specific jurisdiction-regulating norms, whose application to national and international proceedings is mired up in doctrinal uncertainty and may be too rigid in nature, broad principles, such as judicial comity and abuse of right, appear to offer a suitable legal framework within which the aforementioned policy considerations can be applied.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.