Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Saving Truth From Paradox$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Hartry Field

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780199230747

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230747.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 January 2021

Are Supervaluational and Revision Theories Self‐Undermining?

Are Supervaluational and Revision Theories Self‐Undermining?

(p.192) 12 Are Supervaluational and Revision Theories Self‐Undermining?
Saving Truth From Paradox

Hartry Field (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

This chapter is concerned with the extent to which supervaluation and revision theories can declare that their rules all preserve truth. The extent varies from one such theory to another, but none can do so entirely, and many actually declare some of their rules not to be truth-preserving. The question is raised whether this makes the theories ‘self-undermining’, and a reason is given why it doesn't. Connections to Gödel's second incompleteness theorem are drawn.

Keywords:   strong supervaluation theories, medium supervaluation theories, revision theories, truth-preservation, truth rules, self-undermining, incompleteness theorems, Gödel

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .