- Title Pages
- Notes on the contributors
- Abbreviations and glossing conventions
- 1 The study of semantic alignment: retrospect and state of the art
- 2 Semantic alignment systems: what's what, and what's not
- 3 Split intransitives, experiencer objects, and ‘transimpersonal’ constructions: (re‐)establishing the connection
- 4 Thematic roles, event structure, and argument encoding in semantically aligned languages
- 5 Why are stative‐active languages rare in Eurasia? A typological perspective on split‐subject marking
- 6 Losing semantic alignment: from Proto‐Yeniseic to Modern Ket
- 7 Intransitive split in Tundra Nenets, or how much semantics can hide behind syntactic alignment
- 8 From ergative case marking to semantic case marking: the case of historical Basque
- 9 The semantics of semantic alignment in eastern Indonesia
- 10 The rise and fall of semantic alignment in North Halmahera, Indonesia
- 11 Verb classification in Amis
- 12 The emergence of agentive systems in core argument marking
- 13 Argument dereferentialization in Lakota
- 14 The emergence of active∕stative alignment in Otomi
- 15 Voice and transitivity in Guaraní
- 16 Agreement in two Arawak languages: Baure and Kurripako
- 17 Affectedness and viewpoint in Pilagá (Guaykuruan): a semantically aligned case‐marking system
- References
- Author index
- Index of languages
- Index of terms
The emergence of active∕stative alignment in Otomi
The emergence of active∕stative alignment in Otomi
- Chapter:
- (p.357) 14 The emergence of active∕stative alignment in Otomi
- Source:
- The Typology of Semantic Alignment
- Author(s):
Enrique L. Palancar
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
Otomi is an Otomanguean, Mesoamerican language whose intransitive verbs display two types of semantic alignment patterns: agent-patient and active-stative. This uncommon feature makes Otomi an interesting language typologically. This chapter advances a proposal about how the active-stative alignment emerged diachronically in the grammar of Otomi.
Keywords: active-stative, agent-patient, diachrony, Otomi, Otomanguean
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .
- Title Pages
- Notes on the contributors
- Abbreviations and glossing conventions
- 1 The study of semantic alignment: retrospect and state of the art
- 2 Semantic alignment systems: what's what, and what's not
- 3 Split intransitives, experiencer objects, and ‘transimpersonal’ constructions: (re‐)establishing the connection
- 4 Thematic roles, event structure, and argument encoding in semantically aligned languages
- 5 Why are stative‐active languages rare in Eurasia? A typological perspective on split‐subject marking
- 6 Losing semantic alignment: from Proto‐Yeniseic to Modern Ket
- 7 Intransitive split in Tundra Nenets, or how much semantics can hide behind syntactic alignment
- 8 From ergative case marking to semantic case marking: the case of historical Basque
- 9 The semantics of semantic alignment in eastern Indonesia
- 10 The rise and fall of semantic alignment in North Halmahera, Indonesia
- 11 Verb classification in Amis
- 12 The emergence of agentive systems in core argument marking
- 13 Argument dereferentialization in Lakota
- 14 The emergence of active∕stative alignment in Otomi
- 15 Voice and transitivity in Guaraní
- 16 Agreement in two Arawak languages: Baure and Kurripako
- 17 Affectedness and viewpoint in Pilagá (Guaykuruan): a semantically aligned case‐marking system
- References
- Author index
- Index of languages
- Index of terms
