Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Unaccusativity PuzzleExplorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Martin Everaert

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780199257652

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 25 November 2020

Unaccusativity as Telicity Checking

Unaccusativity as Telicity Checking

Chapter:
(p.60) 2 Unaccusativity as Telicity Checking
Source:
The Unaccusativity Puzzle
Author(s):

Angeliek van Hout

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0003

Which lexical-semantic properties determine unaccusativity—the division of intransitive verbs into two syntactically distinct classes—and how does the lexicon-syntax mapping system account for this? This chapter argues that a single factor plays a role in Dutch: telicity. No effects are attested for agentivity or notions such as internal versus external control. It proposes a configurational theory of unaccusativity which is driven by feature checking of this aspectual feature, and has no use for thematic roles. The role of telicity in the lexicon-syntax interface of two-argument verbs predicts the syntax of one-argument verbs: telic one-argument verbs are unaccusative, whereas atelic one-argument verbs are unergative. Two-argument verbs need to project a direct object in order to establish a telic interpretation. This generalization is modeled at the lexicon-syntax interface where the aspectual feature of telicity must be syntactically checked in object position; specifically, Agr OP is the locus of telicity checking.

Keywords:   telicity, Dutch, lexicon, semantics, unaccusativity

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .