Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Unaccusativity PuzzleExplorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Martin Everaert

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780199257652

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 25 November 2020

Unergative Adjectives and Psych Verbs

Unergative Adjectives and Psych Verbs

Chapter:
(p.84) 3 Unergative Adjectives and Psych Verbs
Source:
The Unaccusativity Puzzle
Author(s):

Hans Bennis

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0004

This chapter argues that the concept of verbal ergativity is not monolithic structurally. It shows three different configurations in which the external argument is absent: (a) there is no v-layer on top of VP; consequences: no external argument, no accusative Case; (b) there is a v-layer on top of VP, and vcontains a passive morpheme; consequences: the passive morpheme absorbs the external argument and accusative Case; and (c) there is a v-layer on top of VP and no external argument is generated; consequences: accusative Case is available. These three configurations correspond to (simplex) ergative constructions, passive constructions, and experiencer object constructions, respectively. The theoretical assumptions required to reach this result are: the verb phrase is/can be a layered constituent; the external argument is the specifier of v; structural accusative Case is checked in vP; the passive morpheme is generated in v, it absorbs the thematic role and the Case features of v; and vmay or may not have a phrase generated in its specifier position. As to the concept of ‘unaccusativity’, the chapter concludes that it lacks any theoretical relevance. The availability of accusative Case is an automatic consequence of the presence of v.

Keywords:   verbal ergativity, VP, verb phrase, unaccusativity, accusative

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .