Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Democratic DriftMajoritarian Modification and Democratic Anomie in the United Kingdom$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Matthew Flinders

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780199271597

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271597.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 18 October 2021

V8. Constitutional Amendment

V8. Constitutional Amendment

(p.215) Chapter 12 V8. Constitutional Amendment
Democratic Drift

Matthew Flinders (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

Although other countries generally require special majorities, popular referendums or other safeguards to ensure that the constitution remains protected from day‐to‐day partisan manipulation, the constitution of the United Kingdom is notable due to the absence of these auxiliary precautions. New Labour did little to dilute their capacity in terms of constitutional amendment.

Keywords:   constitutional amendment, referendums, thresholds, direct democracy, anti‐majoritarian institutions, special majorities, auxiliary precautions, constitutional rigidity, constitutional flexibility

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .