Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Corporate Governance in ContextCorporations, States, and Markets in Europe, Japan, and the US$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Klaus J. Hopt, Eddy Wymeersch, Hideki Kanda, and Harald Baum

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780199290703

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290703.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 29 October 2020

Regulatory Paternalism: When is it Justified?

Regulatory Paternalism: When is it Justified?

(p.302) (p.303) Regulatory Paternalism: When is it Justified?
Corporate Governance in Context

Anthony I. Ogus

Oxford University Press

Paternalism appears to lie behind a large number of regulatory measures. These include not only specific instances such as compulsory social insurance; the compulsory wearing of seatbelts and safety helmets; and ‘cooling-off periods’ enabling consumers and investors to withdraw from contractual undertakings. They also include, more generally, prohibiting or controlling certain risk-generating products and services (for example, meat which may be contaminated by BSE) as an alternative to providing information on the risk and leaving it to consumers to decide whether they wish to purchase the product or service. The appropriateness or otherwise of a paternalist intervention would appear to be a particularly important issue for theoretical analysis, not the least because in modern times policy makers appear to be caught on the horns of a dilemma: in a risk-obsessed society there is an ever-increasing expectation that governments will provide citizens with protection, and yet there is also a greater degree of scepticism of the ability of governments to do this successfully. This chapter argues that paternalism is, in appropriate circumstances, a legitimate and important reason for interventionist measures and, as such, should be taken seriously by regulatory scholars and policy makers. It presents an analytical framework which can establish an impressionistic profile for a given paternalistically justified measure, thereby giving some indication of whether the costs involved are likely to be disproportionate to the prospective benefits.

Keywords:   paternalism, paternalist regulation, analytical framework, governance

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .