Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Health Care CaseThe Supreme Court's Decision and Its Implications$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nathaniel Persily, Gillian E. Metzger, and Trevor W. Morrison

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199301058

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199301058.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 12 June 2021

A Most Improbable 1787 Constitution

A Most Improbable 1787 Constitution

A (Mostly) Originalist Critique of the Constitutionality of the ACA

Chapter:
(p.28) Chapter 3 A Most Improbable 1787 Constitution
Source:
The Health Care Case
Author(s):

Richard A. Epstein

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199301058.003.0004

The United States has had two constitutions over the past 225 years. The first Constitution, which featured limited government and strong property rights, was crafted in 1787, after which it was duly ratified in a set of state conventions. The second was crafted during the New Deal by a set of Supreme Court decisions that inverted the old order by allowing large government agencies to operate freely in a regime of weak property rights. The second Constitution grants the federal government powers of taxation and regulation that are far greater than those in the 1787 Constitution. The force of this second Constitution, on both the liberal and conservative justices, was on full display in NFIB v. Sebelius (NFIB). Debate in the case blurred the lines between the two Constitutions by making it appear at critical junctures that the original Constitution supported this bold new initiative.

Keywords:   Supreme Court, Constitution, constitutional law, health care, Affordable Care Act, Commerce Clause, tax power, John Roberts, NFIB v. Sebelius, originalism

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .