Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Theory vs. Anti-Theory in EthicsA Misconceived Conflict$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.
Theory vs. Anti-Theory in Ethics: A Misconceived Conflict

Nick Fotion

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199373529

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: June 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373529.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use.date: 06 July 2022

Virtue Theories: of Michael Slote, Rosalind Hursthouse, and Timothy Jackson

Virtue Theories: of Michael Slote, Rosalind Hursthouse, and Timothy Jackson

Chapter:
(p.193) Chapter 10 Virtue Theories: of Michael Slote, Rosalind Hursthouse, and Timothy Jackson
Source:
Theory vs. Anti-Theory in Ethics
Author(s):

Nick Fotion

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373529.003.0011

Although Slote and Hursthouse differ, as virtue theorists, in that the former is not a consequentialist while the latter is, they are both grand theorists. Jackson introduces religious commitments into the discussion. The three together make it clearer than before that theories in ethics are surprisingly varied.

Keywords:   Michael Slote, Rosalind Hursthouse, Timothy Jackson, consequentialism, religion

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .