Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
TaintedHow Philosophy of Science Can Expose Bad Science$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Kristin Shrader-Frechette

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199396412

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: October 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199396412.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 14 April 2021

Hormesis Harms

Hormesis Harms

The Emperor Has No Biochemistry Clothes

(p.29) Chapter 3 Hormesis Harms

Kristin Shrader-Frechette

Oxford University Press

This chapter illustrates analysis of the hormesis concept in biochemistry—discussed by Edward Calabrese—and shows how its scientific support relies on logical fallacies that include equivocation, invalid extrapolation, hasty generalization, inconsistency, begging the question, and confusing necessary and sufficient conditions. The chapter illustrates that, even without obtaining any data on hormesis, practical philosophers of science often can use logic to uncover flawed scientific methods.

Keywords:   begging the question, biochemistry, Calabrese, equivocation, extrapolation, hormesis

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .