The conclusion provides a summary of the main findings of this study. It details how each chapter contributes to a ‘thick description’ of the legal cultures of the ICTR, the Rwandan national courts and gacaca. It highlights the argument that the courts’ cultural incongruence helps to explain the conflicts among the international, national and localized layers of post-genocide justice. As a result, this research contributes to a theory on the role of courts during transitions and has specific policy relevance for the practice of concurrent transitional justice and the ICC’s principle of complementarity. The book concludes with an argument that cooperation among international, national and localized criminal justice initiatives can be strengthened through more continued and equal contact among the judges, lawyers and witnesses involved in these differing legal institutions.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.