Ethical considerations for the scheduling of work in continuous operations: physicians in training as a case study
Ethical considerations for the scheduling of work in continuous operations: physicians in training as a case study
One of the barriers that has repeatedly derailed attempts to address the issue of work-hour restrictions is the long hours worked by resident physicians during training. It is very difficult for specialists in occupational health — who champion workplace safety issues ranging from hearing protection to exposure to chemical carcinogens — to argue that sixteen-hour work shifts are hazardous when physicians routinely care for patients working twenty-four-hour shifts. Though a consolidated episode of ten hours of sleep restores performance to baseline levels for a few hours, those with a history of chronic sleep loss deteriorate much more rapidly as the number of consecutive hours of wakefulness increases, particularly overnight. Once physician work-hour reform has been implemented successfully in the United States, it will serve as the foundation for implementation of safer work schedules in a wide variety of industries.
Keywords: resident physicians, junior doctors, chronic sleep loss, acute sleep loss, work-hour reform, wakefulness, occupational health, occupational injury, longer work hours, attentional failures
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .