- Title Pages
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter Abstracts
- 1 Does God Love Us?
- Comments on ‘Does God Love Us?’
- Reply to Stump
- 2 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob
- Comments on ‘The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob’
- Reply to van Inwagen
- 3 Satanic Verses:Moral Chaos in Holy Writ
- Comments on ‘Satanic Verses: Moral Chaos in Holy Writ’
- Reply to Plantinga
- 4 Animal Sacrifices*
- Comments on ‘Animal Sacrifices’
- Reply to Crenshaw
- 5 God Beyond Justice*
- Comments on ‘God Beyond Justice’
- Reply to Morriston
- 6 The Problem of Evil and the History of Peoples: Think Amalek
- Comments on ‘The Problem of Evil and the History of Peoples’*
- Reply to Draper
- 7 What Does the Old Testament Mean?
- Comments on ‘What Does the Old Testament Mean?’
- Reply to Morriston
- 8 Reading Joshua
- Comments on ‘Reading Joshua’
- Reply to Antony
- 9 What About the Canaanites?
- Comments on ‘What About the Canaanites?’
- Reply to Wolterstorff
- 10 Canon and Conquest: The Character of the God of the Hebrew Bible*
- Comments on ‘Canon and Conquest’
- Reply to Fales
- 11 God's Struggles
- Index
Reply to Morriston
Reply to Morriston
- Chapter:
- (p.232) Reply to Morriston
- Source:
- Divine Evil?
- Author(s):
Swinburne Richard
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
I claimed that if the Bible (including the Old Testament) is to be understood as ‘revelation [from God] without error’, it should be the Bible interpreted in the way that some of the Fathers taught us; that is in the light of Christian doctrine (including Christian moral teaching) and scientific knowledge. God's ‘inspiration’ of the Bible might involve God's inspiration not of the first author of short passages but of compilers of these into larger units. So there is no need to hold (and I don't hold) that God had any role in inspiring the first human author of Psalm 137: 9. But what I refuse to say is what Professor Morriston seems to want to say of that verse and other passages which he regards as morally inadequate, that they are simply false: ‘They don't speak for God.’ And why I refuse to say this is because I think that these passages have different meanings according to the context in which they are inscribed. And when regarded as part of the Christian Bible, and interpreted in the way that that demands, they certainly do ‘speak for God’....
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .
- Title Pages
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter Abstracts
- 1 Does God Love Us?
- Comments on ‘Does God Love Us?’
- Reply to Stump
- 2 The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob
- Comments on ‘The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob’
- Reply to van Inwagen
- 3 Satanic Verses:Moral Chaos in Holy Writ
- Comments on ‘Satanic Verses: Moral Chaos in Holy Writ’
- Reply to Plantinga
- 4 Animal Sacrifices*
- Comments on ‘Animal Sacrifices’
- Reply to Crenshaw
- 5 God Beyond Justice*
- Comments on ‘God Beyond Justice’
- Reply to Morriston
- 6 The Problem of Evil and the History of Peoples: Think Amalek
- Comments on ‘The Problem of Evil and the History of Peoples’*
- Reply to Draper
- 7 What Does the Old Testament Mean?
- Comments on ‘What Does the Old Testament Mean?’
- Reply to Morriston
- 8 Reading Joshua
- Comments on ‘Reading Joshua’
- Reply to Antony
- 9 What About the Canaanites?
- Comments on ‘What About the Canaanites?’
- Reply to Wolterstorff
- 10 Canon and Conquest: The Character of the God of the Hebrew Bible*
- Comments on ‘Canon and Conquest’
- Reply to Fales
- 11 God's Struggles
- Index