Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Cognitive Phenomenology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Tim Bayne and Michelle Montague

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199579938

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579938.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 17 January 2022

The Phenomenology of Particularity

The Phenomenology of Particularity

Chapter:
(p.121) The Phenomenology of Particularity
Source:
Cognitive Phenomenology
Author(s):

Michelle Montague

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579938.003.0006

We perceive individual physical objects, and we perceive them as individual physical objects—as discrete, numerically distinct, as particulars: it is part of the experiential qualitative character of many of our perceptual experiences that they are experiences of individual particular objects. This fact—the fact of the ‘particularity of perception’, the ‘phenomenological particularity fact’—is the present concern of this paper. The paper begins with an argument that current theories of content, both ‘generalist’ and ‘particularist’, fail to account for it adequately. The author then sketches a general theory of mental content (both phenomenological content and non‐phenomenological content) that does provide the resources to give an adequate account of it. In particular, it gives a phenomenological account of it. There is a distinctive feature of the phenomenological content of perceptual experiences, which the author calls object‐positing or taking as object. This object‐positing is a fundamental category of perception, a basic structural element of our perceptions and perceptual experiences. The author argues that object‐positing is best understood as an example of what philosophers now call cognitive phenomenology, a kind of phenomenology distinct from sensory phenomenology. Finally, it is argued that although object‐positing is a distinctively phenomenological matter, it is an essential part of fixing external reference to objects of perception.

Keywords:   particularity, phenomenal particularity, phenomenological particularity, content, perception, sensory phenomenology, cognitive phenomenology, object‐positing

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .