Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
From Bilateralism to Community InterestEssays in Honour of Bruno Simma$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ulrich Fastenrath, Rudolf Geiger, Daniel-Erasmus Khan, Andreas Paulus, Sabine von Schorlemer, and Christoph Vedder

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199588817

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 23 September 2020

The Responsibility to Protect: Spelling out the Hard Legal Consequences for the UN Security Council and its Members

The Responsibility to Protect: Spelling out the Hard Legal Consequences for the UN Security Council and its Members

Chapter:
(p.297) The Responsibility to Protect: Spelling out the Hard Legal Consequences for the UN Security Council and its Members
Source:
From Bilateralism to Community Interest
Author(s):

Anne Peters

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.003.0022

Bruno Simma has made important contributions, as a scholar and as a practitioner, both to the legal regimes of the protection of civilians (human rights law, humanitarian law, international criminal law, and refugee law), and to the law on the use of force. The new concept ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) constitutes a synthesis of these regimes. This chapter spells out the legal consequences of R2P, postulated as a binding legal principle of international law, for the Security Council and its members. The chapter is a thought experiment, because the binding legal force of R2P is not settled. It is argued that, once R2P is accepted as a fully fledged legal principle, the Security Council (and its members) would be under a legal obligation to authorize, namely to take sufficiently robust action in R2P situations. The chapter then discusses the problems engendered by the acceptance of such a material obligation and suggests a procedural obligation to justify inaction instead.

Keywords:   international law, Security Council, legal obligations, responsibility to protect, R2P

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .