Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
From Bilateralism to Community InterestEssays in Honour of Bruno Simma$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ulrich Fastenrath, Rudolf Geiger, Daniel-Erasmus Khan, Andreas Paulus, Sabine von Schorlemer, and Christoph Vedder

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199588817

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 03 December 2021

Of Rights and Remedies: Sovereign Immunity and Fundamental Human Rights

Of Rights and Remedies: Sovereign Immunity and Fundamental Human Rights

(p.825) Of Rights and Remedies: Sovereign Immunity and Fundamental Human Rights
From Bilateralism to Community Interest

Enzo Cannizzaro (Contributor Webpage)

Beatrice I Bonafé

Oxford University Press

The relationship between the legal regime of sovereign immunity and international human rights law has been quite a hot topic in recent years. Not infrequently, domestic courts have been requested to lift sovereign immunity and to determine civil or criminal consequences of conduct allegedly in breach of international rules protecting fundamental values. These requests have prompted a conspicuous, yet not always fully consistent, pattern of case law and an endless scholarly debate. The traditional view tends to maintain that sovereign immunity is expressed by procedural rules, and that therefore such rules are structurally of such a nature as to preclude conflicts with rules prohibiting egregious violations of human rights, which are substantive law by nature. At the other end of the spectrum, some authors have argued that rules granting immunity have the effect of preventing fundamental human rights law from attaining its full effect. Consequently, it is argued, rules of immunity ought to be disregarded on the basis of the superior rank of rules protecting such rights. An infinite variety of intermediate opinions have also been expressed, highlighting either the traditional inter-State character inspiring the rules on immunity, or the universal character of the emerging law of human rights. This chapter analyzes this topic from a particular methodological angle. It maintains that the difficulty in dealing with that issue mainly lies in the asymmetry in the development of the international law of human rights which has created individual substantive rights without creating a corresponding set of remedies.

Keywords:   sovereign immunity, international law, human rights law, remedies, case law

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .