Introduction Framing the Crisis: Accident, Fiasco, or Debacle?
Introduction Framing the Crisis: Accident, Fiasco, or Debacle?
The introductory chapter sets the book up as an intervention in the debate about the financial crisis by engaging in some of the possible conceptualizations of accident. The concepts of accident and fiasco are explored, drawing on the original usage by Perrow and Scott, and also incorporating analysis of the current financial crisis by Donald MacKenzie, Andrew Haldane, and Gillian Tett. Accident and fiasco are rejected in favour of debacle, a significant, non-reversible collection of outcomes that shift the balance of power, caused in part by hubris involving banking, regulatory, and political elites. The chapter and book argue that the crisis is the result of accumulating small decisions by individual banks and bankers. At the same time the regulators and political elites bought into a high modernist project of supporting a light-touch regime that largely trusted financial markets to deal with their own problems.
Keywords: financial crisis, debacle, hubris, accident, political elites, Charles Perrow
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .
