Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Erik Svensson and Ryan Calsbeek

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199595372

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: December 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595372.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 17 January 2022

Adaptive Landscapes, Evolution, and the Fossil Record

Adaptive Landscapes, Evolution, and the Fossil Record

Chapter:
(p.243) Chapter 15 Adaptive Landscapes, Evolution, and the Fossil Record
Source:
The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology
Author(s):

Michael A. Bell

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199595372.003.0015

Fitness and adaptive landscapes have theoretical limitations, but they have played a valuable role in integrating population genetics and macroevolution. Sewall Wright introduced fitness landscapes in 1931 to describe the relationship between genotypes and fitness, and George G. Simpson modified and popularized the concept of landscapes in evolutionary biology in 1944 as adaptive landscapes to illustrate the evolutionary response of fossil lineages to natural selection. Patterns of sediment and fossil accumulation impose practical limitations on the use of adaptive landscapes to analyze fossil data. Phenotypic evolution can occur too rapidly to resolve in the stratigraphic record, hindering observation of movement of lineages upward on an adaptive peak. Use of the null hypothesis of a random phenotypic walk through time (i.e., genetic drift) to test for adaptation in the trajectory of change in fossil lineages has consistently led to rejection of adaptation, but recent methods, including a maximum likelihood procedure for individual lineages and simultaneous analysis of multiple species and traits, indicate that fossil lineages have ascended adaptive peaks and remained at their summits as they shift position through time. Recognition of the limits to temporal resolution in fossil lineages provide guidance for the selection of fossil lineages to study, and development of new statistical tools have enhanced the value of adaptive landscapes to analyze the fossil record.

Keywords:   fossil lineages, George G. Simpson, macroevolution, natural selection, stratigraphic sequence, phenotypic evolution

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .