Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Act and CrimeThe Philosophy of Action and its Implications for Criminal Law$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael S. Moore

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780199599509

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599509.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 05 March 2021

The Doctrinal Basis of the Actus Reus Requirement

The Doctrinal Basis of the Actus Reus Requirement

(p.169) 7 The Doctrinal Basis of the Actus Reus Requirement
Act and Crime

Michael S. Moore (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

Whether there is a unitary and coherent doctrine that can be referred to as the ‘actus reus requirement’ is the topic of this chapter. Two worries about this doctrine are examined and allayed. One is that actus reus cannot be distinguished from other elements of liability such as mens rea, causation, or absence of justification or excuse. The other is that there is no reality to the kinds of actions criminal statutes prohibit so that what such statutes prohibit is indeterminate.

Keywords:   actus reus, mens rea, justification, excuse, act types

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .