Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Law and NeuroscienceCurrent Legal Issues Volume 13$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael Freeman

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199599844

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599844.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 26 September 2021

Lost in Translation? An Essay on Law and Neuroscience

Lost in Translation? An Essay on Law and Neuroscience

(p.529) 28 Lost in Translation? An Essay on Law and Neuroscience
Law and Neuroscience

Stephen J. Morse

Oxford University Press

The rapid expansion in neuroscientific research fuelled by the advent of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been accompanied by popular and scholarly commentary suggesting that neuroscience may substantially alter, and perhaps will even revolutionize, both law and morality. This chapter attempts to put such claims in perspective and considers how properly to think about the relation between law and neuroscience. The overarching thesis is that neuroscience may indeed make some contributions to legal doctrine, practice, and theory, but such contributions will be few and modest for the foreseeable future. The first part of the chapter describes the law's implicit folk psychological view of human behaviour and why any other model is not possible at present. It then turns to dangerous distractions that have bedevilled clear thinking about the relation between scientific explanations of human behaviour and law. Next, it considers how to translate the mechanistic findings of neuroscience into the folk psychological concepts the law employs. Finally, illustrative case studies of the legal relevance of neuroscience studies are presented. The discussion and all the examples focus on criminal law and on competence for the sake of simplicity and coherence, but the arguments are almost all generalizable to other legal contexts.

Keywords:   neuroscience, law, legal doctrine, legal practice, legal theory

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .