The mental causation debate has proved unfruitful because philosophers involved set out from incommensurable starting points. Some begin with the thought that we must look to scientific practice to locate causal kinds. Psychology is a successful science, so psychological properties must be causally efficacious. Metaphysicians who say otherwise have a cockeyed conception of causation. Others find such arguments beside the point. Scientific practice suggests that mental properties are causally relevant to physical goings-on, but the question is not whether this is so, but how this could possibly be so. Perhaps the impasse stems from assumptions both sides share but rarely acknowledge.
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.