Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Equality and Opportunity$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Shlomi Segall

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199661817

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661817.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use.date: 25 June 2022

Equality of Outcome

Equality of Outcome

Chapter:
(p.34) 2 Equality of Outcome
Source:
Equality and Opportunity
Author(s):

Shlomi Segall

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661817.003.0002

Is there symmetry between equalities and inequalities within a theory of justice? Most luck egalitarians argue that both equalities and inequalities can be unjust, namely when they do not track choice. This chapter argues that equalities (in that which ultimately matters, e.g. welfare) can never be unjust. Only inequalities can ever be unjust. To show this the chapter examines a series of scenarios which are thought to be embarrassing for the asymmetrical view (the view that only inequalities, and never equalities, are potentially unjust). It shows that upon reflection, none of the implications of the asymmetrical view is counterintuitive.

Keywords:   Responsibility, equality, outcome, inequality, redress, desert, talents

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .