Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Knowledge, Organization, and ManagementBuilding on the Work of Max Boisot$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John Child and Martin Ihrig

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199669165

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2013

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669165.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 24 January 2021

Generating Knowledge in a Connected World: The Case of the ATLAS Experiment at CERN *

Generating Knowledge in a Connected World: The Case of the ATLAS Experiment at CERN *

Chapter:
(p.142) (p.143) 8 Generating Knowledge in a Connected World: The Case of the ATLAS Experiment at CERN*
Source:
Knowledge, Organization, and Management
Author(s):

Max Boisot

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669165.003.0008

The spatial challenges posed by the dynamics of globalization together with the availability of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) have fostered the development of virtual collaboration. Driven by organizational authority systems, however, much of this activity remains of a top-down, hierarchical nature. Although the proportion of bottom-up activity has increased, it has not displaced the top-down bias in the governance structures of firms and the formal processes that give them effect. Yet recent developments are challenging the organizational assumptions that underpin such structures and processes. In what follows, we first offer a theoretical perspective on the above questions and then illustrate it with a look at the way that the ATLAS experiment at CERN—one of the four experiments that are using the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)—is organized and managed. The ATLAS Collaboration—the team of physicists responsible for the experiment—consists of a culturally heterogeneous and loosely coupled population of agents, each operating in a different institutional setting. We shall use our theoretical perspective to interpret some of the issues raised by this kind of ‘big science’ experiment and discuss their implications for a broader class of organizations.

Keywords:   communication technologies, knowledge flow, organizational coordination

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .