Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Nicholas Bamforth and Peter Leyland

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199670024

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670024.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 28 November 2020

Accountability to Law

Accountability to Law

Chapter:
(p.77) 4 Accountability to Law
Source:
Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution
Author(s):

T R S Allan

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670024.003.0004

This essay investigates the idea of legal accountability, applicable to public authorities, by reflection on some major debates within constitutional theory. Theories of legal and political constitutionalism are compared and debate over the constitutional foundations of judicial review is examined. It is argued that a largely instrumentalist view of law, in tune with legal positivism, has hindered our grasp of ideas critical to the principle of accountability. A view of the rule of law as a fundamental safeguard of freedom is defended: legality is an important moral value linked to other democratic political values. Accountability to law is more than compliance with positive law: it means respect for principles of legality and legal process that characterize the British constitution, interpreted as the charter of a free and democratic legal order. Judicial review of administrative action, defending fundamental rights, is justified by a legal constitutionalism rooted in genuinely republican conceptions of law and liberty.

Keywords:   constitutional theory, judicial review, the rule of law, legality, legal constitutionalism, political constitutionalism, legal positivism, principle of accountability, legal process, administrative action

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .