Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Criminalization of European Cartel EnforcementTheoretical, Legal, and Practical Challenges$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Peter Whelan

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780199670062

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670062.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 19 June 2021

European Antitrust Criminalization and the First Challenge of Due Process

European Antitrust Criminalization and the First Challenge of Due Process

A ‘Strengthening of Rights’ in Favour of the Accused?

Chapter:
(p.117) 5 European Antitrust Criminalization and the First Challenge of Due Process
Source:
The Criminalization of European Cartel Enforcement
Author(s):

Peter Whelan

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670062.003.0005

This chapter determines whether in practice the concept of due process obstructs a project of antitrust criminalization which respects the procedural requirements of European human rights law. It articulates the legal framework informing the challenges of due process which are analysed; specifically, it highlights how the introduction of criminal cartel sanctions ensures the applicability of Article 6 ECHR to antitrust proceedings. It then examines whether, in applying Article 6 ECHR, one must in fact strengthen certain procedural rights: it examines the validity of the ‘strengthening of rights’ contention. Once the extent of such validity is established, the chapter examines the actual impact of the ‘strengthening of rights’ contention. Two inquiries are made in this context, namely, whether: (i) any ‘strengthening of rights’ required has a potential negative impact upon European antitrust enforcement; and (ii) the European antitrust authorities can compensate for any potential negative impact identified.

Keywords:   bounties, criminal enforcement powers, division of functions, due process, leniency, standard of proof, right to silence, strengthening of rights

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .