Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Hidden Histories of War Crimes Trials$

Kevin Heller and Gerry Simpson

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780199671144

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2014

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671144.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. date: 24 November 2020

(p.xiii) Table of Cases

(p.xiii) Table of Cases

Source:
The Hidden Histories of War Crimes Trials
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Argentina (El Jucio a las Juntas)

  • Etchecolatz (Causa 2251/06) 371

  • Juicio a Christian Federico Von Wernich, Causa 2506/07, Tribunal Oral en lo Criminal Federal No.1 de La Plata, November 2007 371

  • Videla case of 22 December 2010 369, 374

Australia

  • Frost v Stevenson (1937) 58 CLR 528 358

  • Hong Kong HK1 trial NAA Canberra A471, 81645 358

  • Morotai M8 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80769 353

  • Morotai M9 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80718 353

  • Rabaul R6 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80744 357

  • Rabaul R9 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80742 364

  • Rabaul R10 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80740 364

  • Rabaul R13 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80737 363

  • Rabaul R 20 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80729 363

  • Rabaul R21 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80730 363, 364

  • Rabaul R23 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80725 363

  • Rabaul R29 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80736 363

  • Rabaul R71 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80984 363

  • Rabaul R81 trial NAA Canberra A471, 80987 363

  • Rabaul R114 trial NAA Canberra A471, 81020 363

  • Rabaul R117 trial NAA Canberra A471, 81023 363

  • Rabaul R130 trial NAA Canberra A471 81057 363

  • Rabaul R180 trial NAA Canberra A471, 81208 357

  • Re Thompson; Ex parte Nulyarimma (1998) 136 ACTR 9 78

  • Trial of Captain Hoshijima Susumu NAA Canberra A471, 80777 334, 344

  • Trial of Captain Kawasaki Matsuhei NAA Canberra A471, 81067 339

  • Trial of Captain Shirozu Wadami et al. NAA Canberra A471, 81709 334, 335

  • Trial of Civilian Fukushima Masao NAA Canberra A471, 81218 341

  • Trial of Civilian Hayashi Yoshinori et al. NAA Canberra A471, 80779 334

  • Trial of General Baba NAA Canberra A471, 81631 341

  • Trial of Guard Hirota et al. NAA Canberra A471, 81204 342

  • Trial of Korean Guard Hayashi Eishun NAA Canberra A471, 81695 340

  • Trial of Lieutenant General Adachi Hatazo NAA Canberra A 471, 81652 334

  • Trial of Lieutenant Tazaki Takehiro NAA Canberra A471, 80713 341

  • Trial of Major General Hirota NAA Canberra A471, 81653 340

  • Trial of Naval Captain Noto Kiyohisa NAA Canberra A471, 81210 339

  • Trial of Private Fukushima Masao NAA Canberra A471, 81060 341

  • Trial of Sergeant Major Sugino NAA Canberra A471, 80716 342

  • Trial of Sergeant Matsushima et al. NAA Canberra A471, 80915 340

  • Trial of Sergeant Miura et al. NAA Canberra A471, 81214 342

  • Trial of Staff Sergeant Matsutaka et al. NAA Canberra A471, 80754 335

  • Trial of Staff Sergeant Sugino Tsuruo NAA Canberra A471, 80716 334

(p.xiv) British Military Court Hamburg

  • Prosecutor v Bruno Tesch (Trial) (1946) 1 War Crimes Law Reports 93 103 (British Military Court, Hamburg) 114

  • Prosecutor v Johan Schwarzhüber (Trial) (Military Court held at No. 1 War Crimes Court Curiohaus, Rothenbaumhaussee, Hamburg, 5 December 1946-3 February 1947) 114

  • Prosecutor v Otto Sandrock (Trial) 1945 1 War Crimes Law Reports 35, 42 (British Military Court for the Trial of War Criminals, Court House, Almelo, Holland) 114

  • Trial of Oberleutenant Gerhard Grumpelt (1946) 1 LRTWC 55 199

Cambodia

  • Prosecutor v Eav (Judgment) (Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia Trial Chamber, Case No. 001/18-07-2007/ECCC/TC, 26 July 2010) 236, 238

China

  • Trial of Takashi Sakai (1946) 14 LRTWC 1 (Chinese War Crimes Military Tribunal of the Ministry of Defence) 29 August 1946 4 388

Estonia

  • In re Paulov Case No. 3-1-1-31-00 Riigi Teataja III 2000, 11, 118 (Supreme Court, Estonia, 2000) 257

Ethiopia

  • Special Prosecutor v Colonel Mengisty Hailamaraim et al. File No. 1/87 Ethiopian Federal High Court 303, 316, 317

  • Special Prosecutor v Colonel Mengisty Hailamaraim et al. Judgment Criminal File No. 30181, Federal Supreme Court, 26 May 2008 306

European Court of Human Rights

  • Engel v Netherlands (No 1) (1976) 1 EHRR 647 126

  • Farbtuhs v Latvia Application no. 4672/02 ECtHR, Judgment (2 December 2004) 261

  • Kolk and Kislyiy v Estonia Application nos. 23052/04 and 24018/04, ECtHR, Decision (17 January 2006) 262

  • Kononov v Latvia Application no. 36376/04 ECtHR, Decision (20 September 2007) 133, 261, 262

  • Korbély v Hungary (European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber, Application No 9174/02, 19 September 2008) 237, 238, 242–3, 244, 262–4

  • Matyjek v Poland Application No 38184/03 30 May 2006 (unreported) 126

  • Penart v Estonia Application no. 14685/04 ECtHR, Decision (24 January 2006) 262

  • Tess v Latvia (No. 2) Application no. 19363/05 ECtHR, Decision (4 January 2008) 261

France

  • Barbie (1985) 78 ILR 136 265

  • Touvier (1992) 100 ILR 337 265

(p.xv) French Tribunals Militaire

  • Prosecutor v Gregorio Lendínez Montes (Trial) (2ème Tribunal Militaire Permanent de Paris 25 April 1947) 115

  • Prosecutor v José Pallejà Caralt (Appeal) (Cour de Cassation de Paris 23 July 1947) 115

  • Prosecutor v José Pallejà Caralt (Trial) (Tribunal Militaire Permanent de la 5ème Région Toulouse, 25 April 1947) 115

Hungary

  • A Magyar Köztársaság Alkotmánybírósága [Constitutional Court of the Republic of Hungary] No 11/1992 5 March 1992 (Decision 11/1992) 231

  • A Magyar Köztársaság Alkotmánybírósága [Constitutional Court of the Republic of Hungary] No 53/1993 13 October 1993 232, 233, 239–40

  • A Magyar Köztársaság Alkotmánybírósága [Constitutional Court of the Republic of Hungary] No 36/1996 4 September 1996. Section II. (1) (Decision No 36/1996) 233, 240

  • Fővárosi Bíróság [Budapest Metropolitan Court] Case No 13.B.563/2001/18, 2 October 2002 242

  • Legfelsőbb Bíróság [Hungarian Supreme Court] No X. 713/1999/3, 28 June 19 241

  • Legfelsőbb Bíróság [Hungarian Supreme Court] No. 1344/1998/3, 5 November 1998 240

  • Legfelsőbb Bíróság [Hungarian Supreme Court] Case No I.1.534/1999/5, 13 September 2000 242

  • Legfelsőbb Bíróság [Hungarian Supreme Court] Case No I.1.535/1999/5, 20 September 2000 242

  • Legfőbb Ügyészség [Office of the General Prosecutor] No. NF.10718/2010/5-I 17 December 2010 246

International Court of Justice

  • Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (D.R. Congo v Belgium), 2002 ICJ 14 February 2002 402

  • Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy) Application instituting proceedings filed in Registry of the Court on 23 December 2008 227

  • Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy) Application of the Federal Republic of Germany, 23 December 2007 221, 225–7

  • Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy) Counter-Claim, 6 July 2010 226

  • Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy, Greece Intervening) Judgment of 3 February 2012 3, 227

  • Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy) Greece requests permission to intervene in the proceedings, 13 January 2011 227

  • Liechtenstein v Guatemala Second Phase, International Court of Justice 6 April 1955 281

  • Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) (Judgment) [1986] ICJ Rep 14 240

International Criminal Court

  • Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges) (International Criminal Court, Pre-Trial Chamber I, Case No ICC-01/04-01/06, 29 January 2007) 236, 318–19

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

  • Prosecutor v Akayesu (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Trial Chamber I, Case No ICTR-96-4-T, 2 September 1998) 236

  • (p.xvi) Prosecutor v Bagaragaza Case No. ICTR-2005-86-S 269

  • Prosecutor v Rutaganda, (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Trial Chamber I, Case No ICTR-96-3-T, 6 December 1999) 236

  • Prosecutor v Semanza (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, Appeals Chamber, Case No ICTR-97-20-A, 20 May 2005) 238

International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia

  • Prosecutor v Blaškić (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber I, Case No IT-94-15-T, 3 March 2000) 238, 279, 320

  • Prosecutor v Delalić et al (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber II, Case No IT-96-21-T, 16 November 1998) 236

  • Prosecutor v Furundžija IT-95-17/1-T 10 December 1998 284

  • Prosecutor v Gotovina et al. (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber I, Case No IT-06-90-T, 15 April 2011) 236

  • Prosecutor v Jelisić Case no. IT-95-10, ICTY Trial Chamber, Judgment (14 December 1999) 259

  • Prosecutor v Kordić and Čerkez (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber I, Case No IT-95-14/2-T, 26 February 2001) 236, 238, 320

  • Prosecutor v Kordić and Čerkez Appeals Chamber, Judgment, 17 December 2004 320

  • Prosecutor v Krajišnik Case No. IT-00-39-T (27 September 2006) 426

  • Prosecutor v Krstić, Trial Chamber, Judgment, 2 August 2001 320, 426

  • Prosecutor v Krstić (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Appeals Chamber, Case No IT-98-33-A, 19 April 2004) 238

  • Prosecutor v Kunarac et al. (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Appeals Chamber, Case No IT-96-23&IT-96-23/1-A, 12 June 2002) 236, 238

  • Prosecutor v Kupreskić et al. Case No. IT-95-16-T (14 January 2000) 425

  • Prosecutor v Milutinović et al. (Judgment) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Trial Chamber I, Case No IT-05-87-T, 26 February 2009) 236

  • Prosecutor v Naletilić Case No. IT 98-34-A, 3 May 2006 426

  • Prosecutor v Stakić Case No. IT-97-24-A (22 March 2006) 425–6

  • Prosecutor v Tadić (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, Appeals Chamber, Case No IT-94-1-AR72, 2 October 1995) [70] (Tadić Interlocutory Appeals) 236, 237, 238, 239, 279

Italy

  • Corte Militare di Appello, Judgment no 72 of 18 December 2007 221

  • Corte Suprema di Cassazione, sezioni unite civili, Judgment no 5044 of 6 November 2003 222, 223

  • Corte Suprema di Cassazione, Sezioni Unite Civili, Judgment no 14199 of 6 May 2008, ‘Repubblica Federale di Germania v Amministrazione Regionale of Vojotia’ in Rivista di diritto internazionale 92 (2009) 223

  • Corte Suprema di Cassazione, sezioni I penale, Judgment no 1072 of 21 October 2008, Rivista di diritto internazionale 92 (2009) 221, 222, 223–4

  • Ferrini, Rivista diritto internazionale 87 (2004) Tribunale of Arezzo, Judgment no 1403/98 of 3 November 2000 221, 222

  • Tribunale Militare di la Spezia, Judgment no. 49 of 10 October 2006 220

(p.xvii) Norway

  • A v The Public Prosecution; The Public Prosecution v A, Supreme Court Judgment, 13 April 2011 273, 274, 275

  • Prosecutor v Mirsad Repak Supreme Court of the Kingdom of Norway, 13 April 2011 275–6

  • Public Prosecuting Authority v Mirsad Repak 08-018985MED-OTIR/08, 2 December 2008 (Oslo District Court, Norway) 267, 272–4, 280

  • Public Prosecutor v Mirsad Repak LB-2009-24039 (April 12, 2010) 274

Poland

  • Trial of Gauleiter Artur Greiser (1946) 13 LRTWC 70 (Supreme National Tribunal of Poland) 4, 411–12, 414, 415, 419–24

Permanent Court of Arbitration

  • Island of Palmas (United States of America v Netherlands) (Decision) (1928) 2 RIAA 829 234

Spain

  • Judgment on the Guatemala Genocide, Case No. 327/2003, 25 February 2003 281

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

  • Case of Atrocities Committed by German-Fascist Invaders in the City of Kharkov and Kharkov Region During Their Temporary Occupation (Military Tribunal of the 4th Ukrainian Front, USSR, 1943) 251

United Kingdom

  • Janson v Driefontein Consolidated Mines Ltd [1902] AC 484 71

  • R v Jones and Milling [2006] UKHL 16 5, 401, 405

United States

  • Ahrens v Clark 335 US 188 (1948) 201

  • Battaglia v General Motors Corp 169 F 2d 254 (1948) 209

  • Bishop v Jones and Petty 28 Tex 294 (1886) 71

  • Boumediene v Bush 553 US 723 (2008) 194

  • Brown v Allen 344 US 443 (1953) 203

  • Burns v Wilson 346 US 137 (1953) 196, 204, 210

  • Burns v Wilson 346 US 844 (1953) 202, 204

  • Carter v Roberts 177 US 496 (1900) 204

  • Cushing, Administrator v United States 22 Ct Cl 1 (1886) 71

  • Eisentrager v Forrestal 174 F 2d 961 (1949) 195, 201

  • Ex parte McCardle 74 US (7 Wall.) 506 (1868) 209

  • Ex parte Milligan 71 US (4 Wall.) 2 (1866) 205

  • Ex parte Quirin 317 US 1 (1942) 205, 207

  • Ex parte Vallandigham 68 US (1 Wall) 243 (1864) 204, 205

  • Fay v Noia 372 US 391 (1963) 203

  • Filartiga v Pena-Irala 630 F 2d 876 (1980) 284

  • Frank v Mangum 237 US 309 (1915) 203

  • Gray, Administrator v United States 21 Ct Cl 340 (1886) 71

  • Hamdan v Rumsfeld 548 US 557 (2006) 194

  • Hiatt v Brown 339 US 103 (1950) 195, 204, 205

  • Hirota v MacArthur 338 US 197 (1948) 205, 207

  • Ibrahim v Department of Homeland Secretary 669 F 3d 983 (2012) 194

  • (p.xviii) In re Grimley 137 US 147 (1890) 204

  • In re Yamashita 327 US 1 (1946) 195, 199, 205, 207

  • Johnson v Eisentrager 338 US 877 (1949) 202

  • Johnson v Eisentrager, 339 US 763 (1950) 4, 193–4, 196, 197, 200, 201, 206, 208–11

  • Johnson v Zerbst 304 US 458 (1938) 203, 204

  • Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 133 S Ct 1659 (2013) 179

  • Milch v United States 332 US 789 (1947) 200

  • Moore v Dempsey 261 US n86 (1923) 203

  • Rasul v Bush 542 US 466 (2004) 194

  • Rasul v Myers 563 F 3d 527 (2009) 194

  • Shapiro v United States 69 F Supp 205 (1947) 204

  • United States v Ali 71 MJ 256 (2012) 194

  • United States v Verdugo-Urquidez 494 US 259 (1990) 193, 194, 196

  • Waley v Johnston 316 US 101 (1942) 202, 203

  • Woolsey v Best 299 US 1 (1936) 203

United States Military Courts in Dachau

  • United States v Alfons Klein (Trial) 1945, 1 War Crimes Law Reports 46, 53 (US Military Commission appointed by the Commanding General Western Military District, USFET) (Hadamar Trial) 113

  • United States v Hans Altfuldisch (Review and Recommendations) (Deputy Judge Advocate’s Office, 7708 War Crimes Group, European Command, APO 178, Case No 000-50-5, March 1946) 107, 116, 118–19

  • United States v Joaquín Espinosa (Review and Recommendations) (Deputy Judge Advocate’s Office, 7708 War Crimes Group, European Command, APO 407, Case No 000-Mauthausen-19, 28 January 1948) (Espinosa Review) 108

  • United States v Joaquín Espinosa (Trial) (Military Government Court, Case No 000-Mauthausen-19, 9–12 May 1947) 7/8 (Espinosa Trial) 108

  • United States v Karl Horcicka et al. (War Crimes Board of Review No. 1) (Office of the Judge Advocate, Headquarters, European Command, Case No 0000-50-5-32, 30 April 1948) (Horcicka Review) 108, 111

  • United States v Lauriano Navas (Review and Recommendations) (Deputy Judge Advocate’s Office, 7708 War Crimes Group, European Command, APO 407, Case No 000-50-5-25, 14 January 1948) (Navas Review) 109, 111, 116

  • United States v Lauriano Navas (Review of the War Crimes Branch— Accused: Fernández, Moisés) (Judge Advocate Division, Headquarters, European Command, AFO 403, US Army, Case No 0000-50-5-25, 18 April 1951) 111

  • United States v Lauriano Navas (Review of the War Crimes Branch - Accused: Lauriano Navas) (Office of the Judge Advocate, Headquarters, European Command, Case No 0000-50-5-25, 18 April 1951) 111

  • United States v Lauriano Navas (Trial) (Military Government Court, Case No 000-50-5-25, 14–21 July 1947) 13/3 (Navas Trial) 109–10, 116, 118–19

  • United States v Martin Gottfried Weiss (Review of Proceeding of General Military Court) (Office of Judge Advocate, Third US Army and Eastern Military District, Case No. 000-50-2, 15 November–13 December 1945) 114

Zonal Trials

  • Government Commissioner of the General Tribunal of the French Zone of Occupation in Germany v Hermann Roechling et al. 14 Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 188

  • In re Tesch 3 Ann. Dig. 250 (UK 1946) 113–14, 116, 188

  • United States v Alfried Krupp et al. 9 Trials of War Criminals 11 (1950) 179, 185, 429

  • (p.xix) United States v Alstötter et al. 14 ILR 274, 320 (Military Tribunal III, 3–4 December 1947) 186, 238

  • United States v Ernst Weizaecker et al. 4 Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 (1949) 16, 43, 186

  • United States v Flick et al. United States Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, Case No 5, 22 December 1947 170, 179, 181, 184, 186, 190

  • United States v Krauch et al. 8 Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 (1952) 165, 179, 181–2, 183, 185, 186, 189, 190, 429

  • United States v Otto Ohlendorf et al. 4 Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, Case No. 9 71, 184

  • United States v Pohl (United States Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, Case No 4, 11 August 1948) 186

  • United States v Sawada Case No. 25, 5 Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals. 1, 7-8 (U.S. Milit. Comm'n Apr. 15, 1946) 198

  • United States v von Leeb, et al. Judgment of 27 October 1948, Military Tribunal V, Law Reports of the Trials of War Criminals, XI 16

  • United States of America v von Weizsaecker et al. Judgment of 11-13 April 1949, Military Tribunal IV, Law Reports of the Trials of War Criminals, XIV 16, 43

(p.xx)